ChatGPT

mjb and mj...ch5. tales of tails

in

Clarification Note: The text of this post was crafted completely by ChatGPT AI with a touch of my own. All images in the post were crafted by Midjourney AI that followed my prompts.

[ Ch.1 ] [ Ch.2 ] [ Ch.3 ] [ Ch.4 ]

As mentioned earlier, I often use AI for entertainment. At this time, I have added an enjoyable twist by envisioning myself assuming the role of a photography magazine writer tasked with crafting an article on the 100-year evolution of portrait photography. Here is the article created by AI following my suggestions.

 

Evolution of Portrait Photography through the Masters

Portrait photography has evolved significantly over the last century, with each era marked by distinctive techniques and stylistic innovations. The works of iconic masters serve as a visual timeline, showcasing the evolution of this art form. Let's delve into the technical and stylistic transformations evident in the 'Boy and His Dog' portraits captured by renowned photographers across different periods.

From the eloquence of classical compositions to the raw authenticity of documentary realism, from probing psychological explorations to the fearless embrace of bold minimalism, and finally, the embrace of cutting-edge innovations in contemporary expression—each photograph unveils a distinct and compelling chapter in this vibrant story.

Edward Steichen (1879-1973)

Steichen's 'Boy and His Dog' portrait epitomizes early 20th-century classicism. Employing a soft focus and painterly aesthetics, he emphasized the subject's connection through meticulous composition and lighting. Steichen's use of chiaroscuro techniques brought depth and intimacy to the relationship portrayed.

Walker Evans (1903-1975)

Evans' approach represented a departure from romanticism, leaning towards documentary realism. His 'Boy and His Dog' photograph showcased a straightforward, unembellished style. Employing sharp focus and clarity, Evans captured the essence of the relationship within its unadorned setting, reflecting the straightforwardness of an era marked by social change.

Diane Arbus (1923-1971)

Arbus challenged conventional portraiture norms. Her 'Boy and His Dog' portrait was unconventional, diving into psychological complexities. Using unconventional angles and stark contrasts, Arbus conveyed a raw, unfiltered emotional connection between the subjects, presenting a departure from traditional compositional norms.

Irving Penn (1917-2009)

Penn's 'Boy and His Dog' displayed refined elegance and precision characteristic of mid-20th-century portraiture. Employing meticulous lighting and posing techniques, he created a composition emphasizing symmetry and balance. Penn's use of controlled studio settings elevated the bond between the boy and dog, exemplifying a harmonious relationship within a controlled environment.

Richard Avedon (1923-2004)

Avedon's 'Boy and His Dog' portrait was a departure from traditional portraiture. Employing stark backgrounds and a minimalist approach, he focused on capturing raw emotion and expression. Avedon's use of high contrast and boldness in composition created a striking visual impact, marking a shift towards unconventional and provocative portraiture.

Patrick Demarchelier (Born 1943)

Demarchelier's 'Boy and His Dog' reflected the evolving contemporary style of the late 20th century. Employing modern lighting techniques and a more relaxed approach to posing, he depicted a casual yet intimate connection between the subjects. His use of natural light and candid moments brought a contemporary sensibility to the traditional theme.

Tim Walker (Born 1970)

Walker's 'Boy and His Dog' departed from reality, embracing surrealism and fantasy. Through elaborate staging and whimsical elements, he created an otherworldly atmosphere. Walker's use of props, elaborate sets, and creative manipulation of light and color challenged traditional portraiture, inviting viewers into a world of imagination.

Annie Leibovitz (Born 1949)

Leibovitz's 'Boy and His Dog' exemplified modern portraiture's fusion of traditional and contemporary elements. Her use of environmental storytelling, combined with innovative lighting and composition, conveyed a narrative depth. Leibovitz merged classic portraiture with a contemporary touch, capturing a timeless yet relatable relationship between the boy and his dog.

The timeless theme of 'Boy and His Dog,' captured by these esteemed masters, not only symbolizes the enduring connection between humans and animals but also acts as a vivid canvas mirroring the continuously changing world of portrait art. This captivating exploration honors the ongoing evolution influenced by shifting aesthetics, progressing technology, and the limitless creativity of artistic minds.

mjb and mj...ch4: reflecting on AI and AI-infused image creation

in

Clarification Note: The text of this post was crafted completely by ChatGPT AI with a touch of my own. The image in the post was crafted by Midjourney AI that followed my prompts.

[ Ch.1 ] [ Ch.2 ] [ Ch.3 ]

Recently, there have been intense discussions about the essence of AI, particularly within the cutting-edge domains of text-to-text and text-to-image systems. Esteemed minds consistently share their thoughts on where AI stands now and where it might be headed. However, the rapid progress in AI fields makes it incredibly challenging for a human to keep pace. It may very well require an AI system itself to thoroughly explore the crucial aspects of this subject.

I have neither the aspirations nor the expertise to participate in the discussions of these distinguished experts. Instead, this serves as my humble reflection, coming from the perspective of an enthusiastic neophyte who uses one of today's leading AI platforms: Midjourney and ChatGPT. My journey begins with a longstanding history in photography and digital images manipulation, supported by an educational foundation in physics, math, and engineering, alongside a self-cultivated grounding in the liberal arts, particularly inclined towards belle letters. This blend of experiences has strongly influenced how I view the AI tools I have at my disposal. I make no claim that my perspective is universal, or even definitively accurate, if such a perspective can indeed be presented.

For around six months, I've immersed myself in using both tools. Some of the outcomes of my efforts, featured within this blog, might offer a clear peek into my creative process i.e. of 'what' I am doing with the tools. However, when faced with the question of 'why' I am doing it, asked by others or even by my own self-reflection, I find myself unable to give a definite answer. Clearly, I'm not pursuing this for practical or financial gain. Undeniably, I take immense pleasure in this pursuit, but that's as far as my explanation goes, and this unanswered question bothers me.

Almost every day, I come up with resolutions that, though sincere, turn out to be fleeting. This quest, in and of itself, is an engaging intellectual adventure, compelling me to voraciously consume and analyze a wide range of information across various fields of knowledge, and engage in deep conversations with ChatGPT. Astonishingly, I've discovered these exchanges to be more fruitful than those with the humans accessible to me.

And here I am, sharing how I currently perceive creation of compelling AI-enhanced images.

So far, I have managed to come up with a list of the current reasons 'why' I am doing it:

1. Addiction to achieving compelling results much faster compared to any other art forms I am practicing

2. Aesthetic pleasure in generating compelling images

3. Intellectual enjoyment that comes from playing with words using loose rules, often leading to unexpected and exciting results.

4. Art Therapy Practice.

5. Having my personal 'museum on demand', that is always accesible

6. Opportunity to simultaneously utilize my skills, this spans fields that previously appeared unrelated to me.

7. Appreciation of people whoes views I value

8. And finally - its uselessness; as Oscar Wilde once coined 'We can forgive a man for making a useful thing as long as he does not admire it. The only excuse for making a useless thing is that one admires it intensely. All art is quite useless.'

Upon assembling this list and examining it, something struck me - "Wait a minute, isn't this a vague description of the reasons Castalians played The Game?” I'm referring to The Glass Beads Game described in 'The Glass Beads Game' by Herman Hesse.

Just in case if you never heard of it "The Glass Bead Game" by Herman Hesse was first published in 1943 in Switzerland. It stands out as one of Hermann Hesse's more overtly speculative and intellectually complex works. Hesse was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1946, "The Glass Bead Game" were a significant factor in him being awarded the prize.

The novel is set in a distant future where society is organized around intellectual and aesthetic pursuits. The central focus of this society is the titular game, that combines elements of music, mathematics, philosophy, and art. The novel explores themes of individualism, intellectualism, and the search for higher meaning. In the book, Hesse deliberately described the game (also known as "Magister Ludi") in abstract and symbolic terms, leaving many details open to interpretation, allowing readers to imagine it in their own way.

This is how one (myself included) may interpret the Game:

Players:

The game is typically played by highly educated individuals, known as Castalians.

Components:

It involves the use of special symbols, often represented by 'glass beads', which are arranged to create complex patterns and structures on the 'board'. Each symbol likely represents a concept or idea from various fields of knowledge. No specific detail regarding 'beads' and 'board' was provided, the terms serve rather as methaphors of the actual devices. However, during the game the players were 'observing the evolving patterns' of the 'beads' composition, that implies that the 'beads' and the 'board' were not just neutral pieces of material but highly advanced devices that contained/could access vast arrays of information and could interact with each other. One has to keep in mind that Hesse envisioned the Game in early 40s, he could not possibly provide even fictional details about the Game specifics as the first electronic computers (possible potential candidates for the game components prototypes) appeared in late 40s and were a far cry from modern devices. Hesse's focus was on the conceptual and symbolic aspects of the Game rather than the physical manipulation of 'beads'.

Integration of Knowledge:

The game involves integrating knowledge from a wide range of disciplines including mathematics, music, philosophy, literature, and more. Players use 'beads' to explore the relationships and connections between these different fields.

Goal and Purpose:

The primary purpose of the game is intellectual and artistic. It serves as a means for players to explore and express complex ideas, often in abstract and symbolic ways.

The goal is to achieve a sense of visual harmony and aesthetic beauty in the arrangement of the 'beads'. The patterns created should be aesthetically pleasing and intellectually stimulating. Watching the "visual poem" would involve observing the evolving patterns and contemplating the meaning and connections behind them. The patterns created would serve as a visual representation of the synthesis of knowledge from diverse fields. It's a way of exploring the relationships between seemingly unrelated concepts.

"The Glass Bead Game" was written in a very different technological context, and Hesse's intentions were likely focused on broader philosophical and intellectual themes rather than specific predictions about AI. Nonetheless, the novel's themes could be a fertile ground for discussions about the role of advanced technology in shaping the pursuit of knowledge and understanding. It may be interpreted and discussed in the context of the AI era and the potential implications of advanced technology on intellectual pursuits.

To my surprise I was not able to find any meaningful discussion on Hesse's role as a prominent AI visioner. It might be that there is none. I suspect that as leading AI developers mostly belong to the 20-40 years old generation they might never heard of him. The novel is not easy to read because of its dense and introspective style, as well as its philosophical themes. People who enjoy this book are usually scholars who study philosophy and related subjects, rather than scientists and technocrats. Also, it's quite long and the way the story is told might need more attention. Or might be its time does not come yet.

Symphony of forms and colors, embodying the essence of 'The Glass Bead Game'

Before we dive into the subject of the post i.e. comparing AI-powered image creation with the complexity of the Glass Bead Game, it's important to acknowledge the current state of Midjourney development. Right now, Midjourney, while promising, is far from the level of the fully developed Glass Bead Game. Rather, it resembles an embryonic phase in the evolution of the Game, showing hints of what AI system could become.

Feature Breakdown

The Glass Bead Game:

Initiator:

Human - Player(s)/Castalian(s)

Initiation Method:

Human-provided arrangement of special symbols, ‘beads’ on a flat ‘board’. The 'beads' and the 'board' could be interpreted as metaphors for highly advanced devices that contain or have access to extensive arrays of information, and possess the capability to interact with one another.

Processing Method:

There is no a definitive description of how it processes the information. The novel just provides a literary and philosophical concept, allowing readers to contemplate the nature of knowledge, creativity, and the synthesis of diverse disciplines.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Domains of Knowledge:

Specific domains are not explicitly defined, but various references suggest the inclusion of the following:

concepts from mathematics, physics, and other scientific disciplines;

musical compositions, musical theories, and artistic elements;

philosophical ideas and concepts;

historical events, works of literature and poetry, as well as literary theories;

concepts from religious and spiritual traditions;

language, linguistics, and the structure of communication;

ethics and morality;

political theories, sociological concepts, and analyses of social structures;

elements of technology

Outcome:

The exact outcome or goal of the game is left deliberately vague and open to interpretation. The main goal of the Glass Bead Game is often thought to be reaching a deeper understanding and insight. It involves exploring and combining complex ideas from different areas of knowledge. This game helps people see connections between things that might seem unrelated at first. It's like a journey to bring together diverse elements in a harmonious and unified way. The result can be a stunning and intricate pattern of interconnected ideas, resembling a work of art.

 
 

Midjourney AI Platform

Initiator:

Human - Prompter/Prompt Engineer

Initiation Method:

Human-written text prompt containing words, phrases, and characters.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Processing Method:

Midjourne uses Large Language Model and Diffusion Model to create unique images based on text prompts. The large language model helps understand the meaning of the prompts and converts them into guides to the diffusion process. The AI image generator begins with a canvas of visual noise, progressively refining it through latent diffusion, resulting in an image representing the objects and concepts described in the prompt.

Domains of Knowledge:

Midjourney is trained on a massive dataset of text and images, and it learns to associate certain words and phrases with certain visual concepts.










Outcome:

When a user provides Midjourney with a prompt, it leverages its understanding of the world to produce an image that aligns with the given prompt. This is accomplished by randomly selecting from the pool of images it has acquired associations with during its training.



 
 

To put it simply, Midjourney, with its blend of Large Language Model AI and Diffusion Model AI, can definitely perform specific tasks in their respective areas. But it doesn't capture the complete, imaginative nature of playing "The Glass Bead Game." This special intellectual pursuit isn't about just getting things done — it's about seeking deep understanding and enlightenment through the fusion of diverse knowledge.

mjb and mj...ch1. i think this is the beginning of the beautiful friendship

in

Clarification Note: The text of this post was crafted completely by ChatGPT AI with a touch of my own. All images in the post were crafted by Midjourney AI that followed my prompts.



Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence demonstrated by machines

Midjourney (Mj) is a generative AI program and service

ChatGPT is a large language model AI chatbot

MJB - Mark Joseph Berman, yours truly

NB - Naomi, Coton de Tulear



MB, NB, ang Mj on the beach - a triad of highly intelligent individuals complementing each other's abilities in the pursuit of happiness

Over the past months, I've dived headfirst into the realm of text-to-image AI. I've embarked on an adventure prompting Midjourney to generate numerous images, and let me tell you, the results left me utterly stunned. It sparked a series of thought-provoking questions that ignited my curiosity:

To what extent are human-AI look-alikes?

As I gazed at the AI-generated images, I couldn't help but wonder how closely they resembled their human counterparts. It's remarkable to witness the AI's ability to capture elements of human likeness, blurring the boundaries between human and machine.

The role of the human in this process - is the human a creator?

Amidst this creative journey, I found myself pondering the role of humans in the text-to-image AI interaction. Are we mere prompters, or can we consider ourselves co-creators? It's a fascinating dynamic, where humans provide the initial spark of inspiration by providing the input—descriptive text or prompts that guide the AI's artistic prowess. It's like giving the AI a virtual canvas and saying, "Create something amazing!" But hey, we're not just co-creators; we're also the eager users who witness the magic unfold.

Are the resulting images an art?

The question of whether AI-generated images can be considered true art sparks lively debates. Some argue that true art requires emotional depth and the human touch, while others appreciate the unique charm that arises from the fusion of human creativity and AI algorithms. It's an exciting blend of imagination and computational brilliance, expanding the boundaries of what we define as art.

What similarities exist between human-AI look-alikes and human-other-living-being look-alikes, such as dog look-alikes?

Intriguingly, the parallels between human-AI look-alikes and human-dog look-alikes caught my attention. It's amusing to observe how both combinations exhibit resemblances that bring a smile to our faces. It's a testament to the creative interplay between humans, AI, and the natural world.

To add a touch of humor and entertainment, I've included some delightful dog-owner look-alike images in this post. These images were prompted and tweaked by yours truly, serving as a testament to the collaborative process between humans and AI.

As I reflect on this exhilarating journey, I can't help but feel a surge of excitement for what lies ahead. The realm of text-to-image AI is brimming with endless possibilities, and I eagerly anticipate the unexpected discoveries and remarkable creations that await us on this road.

So, my friends, join me as we venture further into the realm of AI-generated images. Let's celebrate the fusion of human ingenuity and AI's computational brilliance, uncovering the breathtaking artistry that emerges from this captivating collaboration. Together, we'll continue to explore and embrace the boundless horizons of AI's creative power.

It's going to be a wild ride, and I'm excited to share it with you in the upcoming chapters. May the Intelligence be with you.